ETIC 07-09 Solicitation of Campus Proposals for Pre-College Programs

Final Report template

Awards Summary

The following four campus precollege proposals were recommended by the grant review committee and approved for the 07-09 ETIC allocation at the July 20, 2007 ETIC meeting.

OIT Pre-Engineering Success through Project Lead the Way
$273,000 Brower
OSU 4-H Tech Wizards Program Replication
$251,000 Rennekamp
OSU Career-Linking in Rural Middle Schools
$116,000 Enochs
PSU Creating the Pre-Engineering Pipeline for Diverse Students
$110,000 Coronado
  TOTAL: $750,000  

Timeline

 Solicitation of Proposals Sent

5/2/07

Proposals Due

5/25/07 at noon

Corrections and Clarifications Due

no later than 6/1/07

Proposals Sent to Review Committee

by 6/1/07

Review Committee Meeting

6/8/07 12-3pm

Finalist Recommendation to ETIC

7/20/07 ETIC Meeting

Grant Awards Announced

7/23/07

Interim Report Due

7/15/08

Program Completion

No later than 6/30/09

Final Report Due

30 days after program completion

Eligibility
Only proposals from Oregon University System (OUS) campuses and the Oregon Health and Science University will be considered and be eligible for funding under this solicitation.  While partnerships, collaboration, and subcontracts with non-OUS entities are permitted, responsibility for the performance of each program will remain with the campus making the proposal and receiving the funds.

Funding Goal
Proposed programs should support the Engineering & Technology Industry Council (ETIC) strategy of doubling the number of engineering and computer science graduates and seek to enhance pre-engineering and applied science education by implementing recommendations from the Oregon Pre-Engineering & Applied Sciences Initiative (OPAS) consistent with one or more of the following strategies:

  • Motivate: Enhance the ability of STEM education programs to increase students’ interest and knowledge of engineering and applied science opportunities;

  • Prepare: Increase the use of improved teaching methods - active learning, student inquiry, engineering problem solving, and creative teamwork.

  • Succeed: Increase the enrollment and successful completion of STEM courses by underrepresented populations.

  • Pathways: Create, develop, and maintain engineering and applied science pathways so that more students successfully transition among education institutions and into the workforce.

Funding Structure
$750,000 will be allocated from ETIC Funds to programs to be performed during the biennium from July 1, 2007 to June 30, 2009.  Programs should begin within 100 days of award notification.   [$375,000 subject to approval of ETIC Budget for 07-08 Fiscal Year and $375,000 subject to 08-09 Fiscal Year Budget by the Oregon State Board of Higher Education.  One half of the awarded funds will be transferred within 30 days of each of the two budget approvals.]

Proposals Submitted

OIT

Affirming Access: Engineering and Computer Science Challenge

$181,127 Yamasaki
OIT Pre-Engineering Success through Project Lead the Way
$300,000 Brower
OSU 4-H Tech Wizards Program Replication
$275,188 Rennekamp
OSU Career-Linking in Rural Middle Schools
$116,951 Enochs
OSU College of Engineering Ambassador Program
$42,500 McFarlane/Momsen
OSU Constructing a Pipeline: Native Americans in Engineering
$73,600 Momsen/Rochefort
OSU Engineer It!  Curriculum Units for 4th-6th Grade
$45,500 Momsen
OSU Impact of Roller Coaster Design Programs on Middle School...

$75,432 Kang
OSU Inclusion...in a National Database Hosted by TeachEngineering
$34,820 Rochefort
OSU Summer Experience in Science and Engineering for Youth (SESEY)
$40,000 Rochefort
PSU Creating the Pre-Engineering Pipeline for Diverse Students
$120,284 Coronado
SOU Industry-Education Partnership for Sustainable STEM Pathways
$33,158 Photinos
UO GK-12 Science Outreach in Remote Oregon Schools
$229,952 Johnson
  TOTAL: $1,568,512  

Selection Criteria

  • Alignment with ETIC mission and OPAS strategies.
  • Breadth and depth of impact on target audiences
    • Number of students or teachers to be served, and
    • Nature, intensity and duration of experience.
  • Sustainability, ability to grow or disseminate the program cost-effectively, and long-term impact.
  • Organizational track record.
  • Proven methodology
    • As previously delivered by this organization, or
    • Documented by other organizations/programs.
  • Quality of evaluation plan.
  • Overall cost, efficient use of funds, and leveraging of other resources.